Gaslighting and dual criteria. Kalinda’s sex had been a shock!

We along with other individuals who called out of the addition of Waverly with this list ended up being literally called shitty by the individual you describe as diplomatic, that has been the true point once I stopped being good. Funny how you’re OK with that but need from me personally an proof of my good might, expecting I’ll invest hours interested in and making screenshots of my terms and upload it with a host just which means you will say it doesn’t matter anyway since you don’t view it as any evidence. In the same way being called that is“shitty “diplomatic behavior” in this alt-reality.

And that is exactly what angers me personally the absolute most about any of it situation. Gaslighting and double criteria. Calling away detailing as bisexual the type who’s very likely gay – as she also utilized your message to spell it out herself – can be an assault on bisexual individuals now (that’s why we talked about insinuation of biphobia in addition, but of program we bet you didn’t view it in that way either similar to name-calling is diplomatic) and now we shouldn’t have any difficulty because “who’s harmed by that”. Then your description this will be harmful because lesbian exposure is in really bad state of program contributes to accusation that referring to lesbians is hi-jacking bi-visibility week. You actually don’t see any nagging problem for the reason that?

And another of the very disingenuous arguments, we you will need to forbid bi fans from seeing Wav as bi because a write-up on a site that is renowned at queer ladies is simply the identical to an opinion of a fan! Except it is not. When folks see it they’ll get the feeling so it’s already formal. Which often can lead to huge strain on the article writers and showrunners to stick to that even if it is not whatever they planned, or they’ll face the fan wrath. And that’s really shitty.

Because of the time you’re taking to argue that this really isn’t a grudge carried over from a bi/lesbian fandom war but really a basic argument from an individual who is reasonable to all or any, i do believe it’s significantly more than fair in my situation to inquire of one to straight straight back up which claim. You don’t desire a screenshot, simply copy/paste something accusatory you’ve written re:bisexual erasure and connect to this article it’s from.

I’ll come back to Laura R’s allegedly antagonistic line: it’s fine for gay/lesbian people to claim her, but In addition think it is just a little shitty for the people when you look at the commentary to whine about other people claiming Waverly as bi.“ We think”

This comment accepts that lesbians have actually the right to claim Waverly, which hits me as pretty diplomatic. She’s not arguing that lesbians should not just claim her that bi females might also achieve this and that yes, it is unnecessary to insistently refuse to just accept that bi women may claim this character too. When comprehended in the context of this entire comment ‘a small shitty’ is not specially confrontational and even suggest. Also so I think it’s disingenuous to pretend that your tone escalated in response to others when in fact it was accusatory from the get-go if I were to accept that ‘a little shitty’ is a shitty word choice, Laura R.’s comment came hours after your first comment about how calling Waverly bi means that all queer women are bisexual by default. How to be gaslighting you if the right time stamps because of these remarks are plainly noticeable?

Once again, the standard argument that this character is obviously homosexual and never bi, is it self perhaps not ‘a small shitty’. In reviewing the proof presented, I’m inclined to concur with you that Waverly might not be bi. What exactly is shitty, is you’ve twisted this in to a full situation of lesbian erasure while the presumption that Heather believes we’re all bisexual by standard. There are more choices that may give an explanation for choice to add Waverly in this list:

-it’s too early to offer her any label at all -Heather has a different sort of interpretation as a lesbian in the future that she can reasonably back up because the evidence doesn’t immediately point to a singular conclusion -Heather, a TV writer who may have access to promo materials from showrunners etc, has a document somewhere with a blurb in which Waverly is described as bisexual -Heather made a mistake because she is human, and may decide to remove Waverly from the list or describe her